/u/T1beriu on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Mayve 66AF is spoofed?
View Article/u/iBoMbY on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Because 66AF isn't Navi?
View Article/u/Madgemade on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
This is Navi. the page you linked states:CL_DEVICE_NAME : gfx1010This is the identifier for Navi.It's not vega as all Vega is gfx90x.Googling gfx1010 will confirm this.
View Article/u/dylan522p on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Proof? This performs significantly different that any other GPU architecture, and the device data that cant be spoofed reflects the same
View Article/u/tchouk on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Even if these are all true, none if it really tells us anything about efficiency without the context if chip size, power usage and number of transistors. And efficiency (power, cost, performance...
View Article/u/ET3D on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark for...
It's in bytes. 16K cache.
View Article/u/LightSpeedX2 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_CACHE_SIZE: 16384 on a RX 480 ?!?
View Article/u/jedidude75 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
MEM_CACHE_SIZE isn't VRAM, because the 2060's MEM_CACHE is 491520.
View Article/u/eudisld15 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_CACHE_SIZe - 1638416gb vram? Max parameter size at 1024Is it really Navi? No sure how to extrapolate from this tho
View Article/u/JasonMZW20 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
It's definitely Navi, which is gfx10.Also, not VLIW2. Still quad-SIMD with 1 instruction width per SIMD. It's GCN6, which should temper expectations a bit.Z-buffer depth was also locked to 16-bit,...
View Article/u/gh0stwriter88 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
Over half the performance of VII in compute.... with only 20 CUs would be pretty good. Looks to be a little under half the perf of a 2080 also in OpenGL which is typically a disadvantage for AMD anyway.
View Article/u/[deleted] on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Well if you look at the responses to your post in the hardware group, the ID seems to correspond to a Vega20 part in the Linux drivers
View Article/u/DrewSaga on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Yeah but why waste that performance on consoles if PC can't have it?
View Article/u/The_Countess on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
That would be the minimum i would expect yes.If they couldn't do that then there would have been no point in moving to a new node.
View Article/u/AzZubana on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Was Polaris a Hawaii replacement?
View Article/u/dayman56 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
You said always though.
View Article/u/emprobabale on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
Beginning of 2018 originallyWhich says nothing about the rumor that it was going to be released at CES but 2 weeks before decided they needed to retape.That rumor is still probably total BS.
View Article/u/Cooe14 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Separate the compute & graphics/gaming results, and things'll make a lot more sense.
View Article/u/KING_of_Trainers69 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
OK, so it's somewhere between 10% and 250% faster than an RX 580. Glad we narrowed it down.
View Article/u/maverick935 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
I don’t think it is clear what those wafers are though. We assume they are buying the Zen 2 I/O die from GF for example. I didn’t mean to imply AMD isn’t doing business with GF still. I just think...
View Article/u/psi-storm on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Thats not right. AMD still has to purchase 12nm+ wafers from GF till 2021.https://www.anandtech.com/show/13915/amd-amends-agreement-with-globalfoudries-set-to-buy-wafers-till-2021
View Article/u/20150614 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Based on the reviews when it launched, the RTX 2070 is around 10% faster than the Vega 64 on average. There are a few games where the Vega 64 is very close or directly higher, but if you don't cherry...
View Article/u/e-baisa on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
If it were to have ~Vega64 performance, then it would be competing vs RTX2070 (and the cut down model- with the RTX2060). They'd have no RTX, so would have to cost a bit lower (maybe ~$400 and ~$300)....
View Article/u/majaczos22 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
Navi may not need HBM to be quick. More HBM3 and low cost HBM were expected this year, the latter one being cost competetive with GDDR (and also easier to implement with 512-bit bus and no interposer...
View Article/u/3G6A5W338E on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
steep price (AMD still makes barely any money on it)AIUI this is due to HBM (fixed parent, where hours ago I typed GCN in place of HBM for some stupid reason). An HBM Navi would still suffer from the...
View Article/u/oneitchyevil on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
I have a feeling this is all Navi will be. People keep getting their hopes up thinking "Navi will compete with Radeon VII" but it wont. Navi is going to be that chip that is stupid cheap, and gives...
View Article/u/TeddyRooseveltballs on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
maybe it's the ps5 gpu?
View Article/u/libranskeptic612 on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
If, as above posted, the clocks are so low, could it not be the U (mobile) version of the 3600G?
View Article/u/DeepllBlue on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance...
Could it be the "leaked" Ryzen 5 3600G APU with 20 (Navi?) CUs? Edit: This could also explain the MEM_CACHE_SIZE: 16 GB system memory, 1 GB reserved for the iGPU (standard BIOS value on most...
View Article/u/looncraz on AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark...
Well less than the 56, but doubled SPs (or the VLIW2 architecture actually being Navi...) would make sense.
View ArticleClik here to view.
AMD 66AF:F1 performance in CompuBench - performance benchmark for various...
submitted by /u/dylan522p [link] [comments]
View Article
